ROB RUN FAQ Addresses Asian Servers and Base Fences
Kefir has posted a FAQ for ROB RUN, the free-to-play PvP crime sandbox now in early access on Steam.
1 source 4h ago
Reporting from 1 source: Game Spark.
Why it matters
The FAQ tells players that the two things driving the most friction right now, server access in Asia and Oceania and base defenses that cars can clear, are both acknowledged but neither is scheduled, with server work pushed past the end of the year.
Key Facts
- ROB RUN is in early access on Steam as a free-to-play title and Japanese is not among its supported languages.
- Kefir said server expansion for regions such as Asia and Oceania is still being assessed for technical feasibility and would come after the end of the year.
- ROB RUN's concurrent player count passed 300,000 on November 13.
- The official X account reported that more than 20,000 cheaters have been banned.
- Kefir said base fences were not designed to be an impenetrable presence for protecting a base.
The FAQ says the developers know about requests for servers in Asia and Oceania but are still considering whether expansion is technically feasible, and that any expansion would come after the end of the year. It also says base fences were never designed to be impenetrable and that defense systems are being reconsidered.
Concurrent players passed 300,000 on November 13, up from more than 140,000 earlier in the run, and the FAQ lands while the game is still finding its footing. On base defense, Kefir says the fences were not designed to be an impenetrable presence protecting a base, though it does not consider the current defense systems perfect and is looking at making intrusion on foot or by vehicle harder. The official X account also reported that more than 20,000 cheaters have been banned, with detection systems being improved and additional protective measures in progress.
Written with AI by Yomimono from the 1 cited source below, including Japanese-language reporting where cited. See our editorial policy.
Add Yomimono as a preferred source on Google